ATM Knockout A-549 Cell Line
Cat.No.:
EDJ-KQ18114
Species:
Human
Cell Name:
A-549
Gene:
ATM
Gene ID:
472
Size:
1×10⁶cells
ATM Knockout Cell Line (A549) is an exclusive upgraded CRISPR/Cas9 system-mediated gene knockout cell, with the advantages of Optimized Strategy Design, Efficient Cell Transfection, High-Performance Cas9 Protein and Hassle-Free Cell Selection.
| Cat.No. | EDJ-KQ18114 |
|---|---|
| Product Name | ATM Knockout A549 Cell Line |
| Cell Line | A-549 |
| Cellosaurus ID | CVCL_0023 |
| Cell Line Synonyms | A 549, A549, NCI-A549, A549/ATCC, A549 ATCC, A549ATCC, hA549 |
| Gene |
ATM |
| NCBI Gene ID | |
| Gene Synonyms | AT1|ATA|ATC|ATD|ATDC|ATE|TEL1|TELO1 |
| Summary |
The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the PI3/PI4-kinase family. This protein is an important cell cycle checkpoint kinase that phosphorylates; thus, it functions as a regulator of a wide variety of downstream proteins, including tumor suppressor proteins p53 and BRCA1, checkpoint kinase CHK2, checkpoint proteins RAD17 and RAD9, and DNA repair protein NBS1. This protein and the closely related kinase ATR are thought to be master controllers of cell cycle checkpoint signaling pathways that are required for cell response to DNA damage and for genome stability. Mutations in this gene are associated with ataxia telangiectasia, an autosomal recessive disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]
|
| Associated Diseases | Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma |
| Morphology | Adherent |
| Passage Ratio | 1/5-1/4 ,2days |
| Complete Culture Medium | F-12K + 10% FBS |
| Freezing Medium | 95% Complete culture medium + 5% DMSO |
| QC | Indels validated by Sanger sequencing; sterility confirmed via microbial testing. |
* For research use only. Not intended for use in humans or animals, including clinical, therapeutic, or diagnostic purposes.
| Loci | STR Info (Sample Cell) Sample Cell Line: A-549 | STR Info (Cell bank) Cell Line: A-549 | ||
| Allele1 | Allele2 | Allele1 | Allele2 | |
| Amelogenin | X | Y | X | Y |
| CSF1PO | 10 | 12 | 10 | 12 |
| D2S1338 | 24 | 24 | ||
| D3S1358 | 16 | 16 | ||
| D5S818 | 11 | 11 | ||
| D7S820 | 8 | 11 | 8 | 11 |
| D8S1179 | 13 | 14 | 13 | 14 |
| D13S317 | 11 | 11 | ||
| D16S539 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 12 |
| D18S51 | 14 | 17 | 14 | 17 |
| D19S433 | 13 | 13 | ||
| D21S11 | 29 | 29 | ||
| FGA | 23 | 23 | ||
| Penta D | 9 | 9 | ||
| Penta E | 7 | 11 | 7 | 11 |
| TH01 | 8 | 9.3 | 8 | 9.3 |
| TPOX | 8 | 11 | 8 | 11 |
| vWA | 14 | 14 | ||
| D6S1043 | 11 | 13 | ||
| D12S391 | 18 | 18 | ||
| D2S441 | 10 | 13 | 10 | 13 |
* STR authentication data of this cell line matches with that of cell lines sourced from ATCC, DSMZ, JCRB, and RIKEN databases.
Conclusion: The STR identification of this cell is correct.
Conclusion: The STR identification of this cell is correct.
* Research Use Disclaimer: Content is generated from publicly available research data, bioinformatic resources, and computational analyses for research reference only.
Related Publications
Homologous Recombination and Alternative End-Joining Repair Pathways are Important Determinants of Radiosensitivity to Proton Radiation Therapy.
IF=6.5
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
PURPOSE:Proton beam radiation therapy (PBT) offers superior accuracy of dose deposition, reducing the risk of adverse effects to surrounding healthy tissues. However, despite high medical need, molecular and cellular determinants of radiosensitivity to PBT remain underexplored, and prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets informing precision medicine strategies for PBT are mostly missing. This study aimed to investigate the role of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways in shaping tumor response to proton versus photon radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS:The study employed genetic and pharmacologic methods to impair DSB repair, including CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing to generate DSB repair deficient (ATM, PARP1, and BRCA2 knockout) A549 and HCT116 cell lines, and pharmacologic inhibitors of ATM and PARP using KU55933 or AZD1390 and olaparib, respectively. Cellular responses to photon (x-rays) and proton irradiation were evaluated through clonogenic survival assays, crystal violet proliferation, and annexin V/7AAD apoptosis assays. To investigate DNA repair mechanisms, U2OS reporter systems were employed, complemented by chromosomal aberration analysis, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Finally, the translational relevance of the findings was validated using the chorioallantoic membrane assay closer representing an in vivo situation. RESULTS:PBT triggered a stronger activation of resection-dependent DNA repair pathways, primarily homologous recombination and alternative end-joining (alt-EJ), compared with photon irradiation. This increased activation was further supported by classical cytogenetics results. Tumor cells deficient in BRCA2, ATM, or PARP1 showed significantly increased sensitivity to PBT, highlighting enhanced relative biological effectiveness in both, in vitro and in the chorioallantoic membrane model. Importantly, combining PBT with olaparib, AZD1390 or KU55933 potentiated tumor cell killing, even in repair-proficient models, showing synergy not observed with photons. CONCLUSIONS:The observed genotype-specific or drug-induced increase in radiosensitivity toward PBT highlights the promise of genetic profiling of DSB repair defects for biology-driven patient stratification and the use of PARP inhibitors in guiding personalized proton radiation therapy strategies.