Recent Promotions
NDUFAF6 Knockout HEK293 Cell Line
Cat.No.:
EDJ-KQ9392
Species:
Human
Cell Name:
HEK293
Gene:
NDUFAF6
Gene ID:
137682
Size:
1×10⁶cells
NDUFAF6 Knockout Cell Line (HEK293) is an exclusive upgraded CRISPR/Cas9 system-mediated gene knockout cell, with the advantages of Optimized Strategy Design, Efficient Cell Transfection, High-Performance Cas9 Protein and Hassle-Free Cell Selection.
| Cat.No. | EDJ-KQ9392 |
|---|---|
| Product Name | NDUFAF6 Knockout Cell Line (HEK293) |
| Cell Line | HEK293 |
| Cellosaurus ID | CVCL_0045 |
| Cell Line Synonyms | Hek293, HEK-293, HEK/293, (HEK)293, HEK 293, HEK,293, 293, 293 HEK, 293 Ad5, Graham 293, Graham-293, Human Embryonic Kidney 293 |
| Gene | |
| NCBI Gene ID | |
| Gene Synonyms | C8orf38|FRTS5|MC1DN17|lncREST |
| Summary |
This gene encodes a protein that localizes to mitochondria and contains a predicted phytoene synthase domain. The encoded protein plays an important role in the assembly of complex I (NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase) of the mitochondrial respiratory chain through regulation of subunit ND1 biogenesis. Mutations in this gene are associated with complex I enzymatic deficiency. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2011]
|
| Associated Diseases | Non-tumor |
| Morphology | Adherent |
| Passage Ratio | 1/5,2days |
| Complete Culture Medium | DMEM + 10% FBS |
| Freezing Medium | 95% Complete culture medium+ 5% DMSO |
| QC | Indels validated by Sanger sequencing; sterility confirmed via microbial testing. |
* For research use only. Not intended for use in humans or animals, including clinical, therapeutic, or diagnostic purposes.
| Loci | STR Info (Sample Cell) Sample Cell Line: HEK293 | STR Info (Cell bank) Cell Line: HEK293 | ||
| Allele1 | Allele2 | Allele1 | Allele2 | |
| Amelogenin | X | X | ||
| CSF1P0 | 12 | 11 | 12 | |
| D2S1338 | 19 | 19 | ||
| D3S1358 | 15 | 17 | 15 | 17 |
| D5S818 | 8 | 8 | 9 | |
| D7S820 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 12 |
| D8S1179 | 12 | 14 | 12 | 14 |
| D13S317 | 12 | 14 | 12 | 14 |
| D16S539 | 9 | 13 | 9 | 13 |
| D18S51 | 17 | 18 | 17 | 18 |
| D19S433 | 15 | 18 | 15 | 18 |
| D21S11 | 28 | 30.2 | 28 | 30.2 |
| FGA | 23 | 23 | ||
| Penta D | 9 | 10 | 9 | 10 |
| Penta E | 7 | 15 | 7 | 15 |
| TH01 | 7 | 9.3 | 7 | 9.3 |
| TPOX | 11 | 11 | ||
| vWA | 16 | 19 | 16 | 19 |
| D6S1043 | 11 | 11 | ||
| D12S391 | 19 | 21 | 11 | 15 |
| D2S441 | 11 | 15 | 11 | 15 |
* STR authentication data of this cell line matches with that of cell lines sourced from ATCC, DSMZ, JCRB, and RIKEN databases.
Conclusion: The STR identification of this cell is correct.
Conclusion: The STR identification of this cell is correct.
* Research Use Disclaimer: Content is generated from publicly available research data, bioinformatic resources, and computational analyses for research reference only.
Research Publications
Functional Screening of NDUFAF6 Variants in Knockout Cells and Complementary Computational Analysis.
IF=2.9
Journal of clinical laboratory analysis
BACKGROUND:NDUFAF6 (NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase complex assembly factor 6) is a nuclear-encoded gene essential for the assembly of mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I (NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase), the largest and most intricate component of the oxidative phosphorylation system, and its mutations are associated with mitochondrial diseases. However, the functional consequences of many NDUFAF6 variants remain unclear. METHODS:We selected 24 NDUFAF6 variants from published studies and our internal sequencing database. Using CRISPR-Cas9, we generated NDUFAF6 knockout HEK293FT cells and transfected them with wild-type or mutant expression vectors. Functional validation was performed using a luminescence-based ATP assay under mitochondrial stress. In silico predictions were conducted using multiple tools, and ColabFold, MitoFates, and ProtScale were used for structural modeling, mitochondrial targeting analysis, and hydrophobicity profiling. RESULTS:Six variants (p.Pro26fs, p.Asp69Val, p.Arg113Ter, p.Leu193Ter, p.Arg303Ter, and p.Lys331Arg) failed to restore ATP levels in knockout cells, indicating a significant loss of function. Among these, p.Asp69Val and p.Arg113Ter were consistent with ClinVar classifications. However, other variants such as p.Arg303Ter and p.Lys331Arg also showed functional impairment, highlighting discrepancies between database annotations and experimental results. Most variants retained mitochondrial targeting features, though p.Pro26fs exhibited a shifted MPP cleavage site. Hydrophobicity analysis indicated structural instability in several variants. CONCLUSIONS:Our study highlights the importance of experimental validation in improving the classification of NDUFAF6 variants. The ATP-based functional assay provides a useful and quantitative approach for assessing mitochondrial variant effects, which may complement in silico predictions and contribute to future efforts in mitochondrial disease diagnostics.
This KO model may be useful for:
- Functional validation of NDUFAF6 variants and their impact on mitochondrial complex I assembly
- Mechanistic studies of mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative phosphorylation
- High-throughput screening for modulators of NDUFAF6-related pathways
- Investigating the role of NDUFAF6 in cellular stress responses and apoptosis
- Complementary computational and experimental analyses of gene–phenotype correlations