BST2 Knockout HEK293 Cell Line
Cat.No.:
EDJ-KQ17861
Species:
Human
Cell Name:
HEK293
Gene:
BST2
Gene ID:
684
Size:
1×10⁶cells
BST2 Knockout Cell Line (HEK293) is an exclusive upgraded CRISPR/Cas9 system-mediated gene knockout cell, with the advantages of Optimized Strategy Design, Efficient Cell Transfection, High-Performance Cas9 Protein and Hassle-Free Cell Selection.
| Cat.No. | EDJ-KQ17861 |
|---|---|
| Product Name | BST2 Knockout Cell Line (HEK 293) |
| Cell Line | HEK293 |
| Cellosaurus ID | CVCL_0045 |
| Cell Line Synonyms | Hek293, HEK-293, HEK/293, (HEK)293, HEK 293, HEK,293, 293, 293 HEK, 293 Ad5, Graham 293, Graham-293, Human Embryonic Kidney 293 |
| Gene | |
| NCBI Gene ID | |
| Gene Synonyms | CD317|HM1.24|TETHERIN |
| Summary |
Bone marrow stromal cells are involved in the growth and development of B-cells. The specific function of the protein encoded by the bone marrow stromal cell antigen 2 is undetermined; however, this protein may play a role in pre-B-cell growth and in rheumatoid arthritis. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
|
| Associated Diseases | Non-tumor |
| Morphology | Adherent |
| Passage Ratio | 1/5,2days |
| Complete Culture Medium | DMEM + 10% FBS |
| Freezing Medium | 95% Complete culture medium+ 5% DMSO |
| QC | Indels validated by Sanger sequencing; sterility confirmed via microbial testing. |
* For research use only. Not intended for use in humans or animals, including clinical, therapeutic, or diagnostic purposes.
| Loci | STR Info (Sample Cell) Sample Cell Line: HEK293 | STR Info (Cell bank) Cell Line: HEK293 | ||
| Allele1 | Allele2 | Allele1 | Allele2 | |
| Amelogenin | X | X | ||
| CSF1P0 | 12 | 11 | 12 | |
| D2S1338 | 19 | 19 | ||
| D3S1358 | 15 | 17 | 15 | 17 |
| D5S818 | 8 | 8 | 9 | |
| D7S820 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 12 |
| D8S1179 | 12 | 14 | 12 | 14 |
| D13S317 | 12 | 14 | 12 | 14 |
| D16S539 | 9 | 13 | 9 | 13 |
| D18S51 | 17 | 18 | 17 | 18 |
| D19S433 | 15 | 18 | 15 | 18 |
| D21S11 | 28 | 30.2 | 28 | 30.2 |
| FGA | 23 | 23 | ||
| Penta D | 9 | 10 | 9 | 10 |
| Penta E | 7 | 15 | 7 | 15 |
| TH01 | 7 | 9.3 | 7 | 9.3 |
| TPOX | 11 | 11 | ||
| vWA | 16 | 19 | 16 | 19 |
| D6S1043 | 11 | 11 | ||
| D12S391 | 19 | 21 | 11 | 15 |
| D2S441 | 11 | 15 | 11 | 15 |
* STR authentication data of this cell line matches with that of cell lines sourced from ATCC, DSMZ, JCRB, and RIKEN databases.
Conclusion: The STR identification of this cell is correct.
Conclusion: The STR identification of this cell is correct.
* Research Use Disclaimer: Content is generated from publicly available research data, bioinformatic resources, and computational analyses for research reference only.
Research Publications
Tetherin Restricts SARS-CoV-2 despite the Presence of Multiple Viral Antagonists.
IF=3.5
Viruses
Coronavirus infection induces interferon-stimulated genes, one of which encodes Tetherin, a transmembrane protein inhibiting the release of various enveloped viruses from infected cells. Previous studies revealed that SARS-CoV encodes two Tetherin antagonists: the Spike protein (S), inducing lysosomal degradation of Tetherin, and ORF7a, altering its glycosylation. Similarly, SARS-CoV-2 has also been shown to use ORF7a and Spike to enhance virion release in the presence of Tetherin. Here, we directly compare the abilities and mechanisms of these two viral proteins to counteract Tetherin. Therefore, cell surface and total Tetherin levels upon ORF7a or S expression were investigated using flow cytometry and Western blot analysis. SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 S only marginally reduced Tetherin cell surface levels in a cell type-dependent manner. In HEK293T cells, under conditions of high exogenous Tetherin expression, SARS-CoV-2 S and ORF7a reduced total cellular Tetherin levels much more efficiently than the respective counterparts derived from SARS-CoV. Nevertheless, ORF7a from both species was able to alter Tetherin glycosylation. The ability to decrease total protein levels of Tetherin was conserved among S proteins from different SARS-CoV-2 variants (α, γ, δ, ο). While SARS-CoV-2 S and ORF7a both colocalized with Tetherin, only ORF7a directly interacted with the restriction factor in a two-hybrid assay. Despite the presence of multiple Tetherin antagonists, SARS-CoV-2 replication in Caco-2 cells was further enhanced upon Tetherin knockout. Altogether, our data show that endogenous Tetherin restricts SARS-CoV-2 replication and that the antiviral activity of Tetherin is only partially counteracted by viral antagonists with differential and complementary modes of action.
This KO model may be useful for:
- Investigating the role of tetherin in restricting viral entry and replication, including for SARS-CoV-2.
- Studying viral antagonism mechanisms that counteract host restriction factors.
- Evaluating the efficacy of antiviral compounds in a tetherin-deficient background.
- Exploring host-pathogen interactions in the context of innate immune evasion.
- Functional validation of tetherin-mediated restriction against emerging viral pathogens.