GO:0010493 Lewis a epitope biosynthetic process: Glycan Epitope Pathway, Genes, Functions and Research Methods
Research-grade guide for scientists and biopharma professionals
Key Takeaways
• GO:0010493 (Lewis a epitope biosynthetic process) describes the biosynthetic route that builds the Lewis a trisaccharide, Fuc-alpha-(1->4)[Gal-beta-(1->3)]GlcNAc, a terminal glycan structure found on plant N-linked oligosaccharides.
• The pathway is defined by the ordered action of glycosyltransferases that add galactose and fucose to an N-acetyllactosamine acceptor on an N-glycan.
• Lewis a epitopes are carbohydrate antigens, and carbohydrate-recognizing antibodies are central tools for detecting and validating such glycan structures in tissue and cell samples.
• Antibody-based detection of glycan epitopes requires rigorous validation, because cross-reactivity and epitope ambiguity are common problems in immunohistochemistry and related assays.
• Computational and experimental methods for epitope characterization, including sequence-similarity and structural analyses, help distinguish genuine epitope recognition from nonspecific binding.
• CRISPR-based cell models (knockout, point mutation, knock-in, overexpression) provide causal tests of whether candidate glycosyltransferase genes are required for Lewis a epitope formation.
Description
GO:0010493, Lewis a epitope biosynthetic process, is a biological process term in the Gene Ontology that covers the chemical reactions and pathways leading to formation of the Lewis a epitope, a trisaccharide with the structure Fuc-alpha-(1->4)[Gal-beta-(1->3)]GlcNAc that is characteristic of plant protein N-linked oligosaccharides. In practical terms, the term describes how a cell assembles a specific fucosylated and galactosylated glycan motif on an N-linked oligosaccharide chain. Because the Lewis a structure is a carbohydrate epitope rather than a protein sequence, its study sits at the intersection of glycobiology, enzymology, and antibody-based detection. Researchers studying this process need reliable reagents and models, since the same glycan can be recognized by antibodies with different fine specificities, and because glycan epitopes are often defined operationally by the antibodies used to detect them. The importance of GO:0010493 extends beyond plants. Lewis-type carbohydrate antigens are widely used as markers and as models for understanding how glycan epitopes are assembled, recognized, and regulated. Antibody generation and validation are therefore integral to research on this term: genetic methods of antibody generation and consortium recommendations for antibody validation provide the framework for confirming that a reagent truly detects the intended epitope. In parallel, computational tools such as Ab-Ligity and analyses of public antibody repertoires help identify sequence-dissimilar antibodies that bind the same epitope and reveal shared structural features of epitope recognition. These approaches are directly relevant to Lewis a research, where the epitope is small, carbohydrate-based, and potentially cross-reactive. Finally, the study of Lewis a epitope biosynthesis is a model for connecting a defined enzymatic pathway to a measurable glycan product. Neutralization epitope mapping in viral capsid proteins and characterization of anti-VH autoantibodies illustrate how epitope definition and reagent specificity are handled in other systems, and the same logic applies to glycan epitopes. Sialic acid O-acetylation in group B Streptococcus and cross-resistance studies in ovarian carcinoma cells further show how carbohydrate modifications and glycan-related phenotypes can be dissected experimentally. Together, these references frame GO:0010493 as a tractable, citation-supported process for pathway, reagent, and CRISPR-model research.
Lewis a epitope biosynthetic process At A Glance
| GO ID | GO:0010493 |
|---|---|
| GO term | Lewis a epitope biosynthetic process |
| Ontology | biological_process |
| Synonym | LE A biosynthetic process |
| Major function | Biosynthesis of the Lewis a trisaccharide epitope Fuc-alpha-(1->4)[Gal-beta-(1->3)]GlcNAc on N-linked oligosaccharides |
| Epitope type | Carbohydrate (trisaccharide) epitope |
| Characteristic context | Plant protein N-linked oligosaccharides |
| Research relevance | Glycan pathway enzymology, antibody-based detection, and CRISPR causal testing of glycosyltransferase genes |
What Is GO:0010493?
GO:0010493 (Lewis a epitope biosynthetic process) is the biological process comprising the chemical reactions and pathways that result in formation of the Lewis a epitope. The Lewis a epitope is a trisaccharide with the structure Fuc-alpha-(1->4)[Gal-beta-(1->3)]GlcNAc, and it is characteristic of plant protein N-linked oligosaccharides. The synonym LE A biosynthetic process refers to the same term. In ontology terms, it is a biological_process, meaning it describes a directed set of molecular events rather than a physical location or a single molecular activity.
Why Is Lewis a epitope biosynthetic process Important in Cell Biology?
GO:0010493 matters because it defines a specific, measurable glycan endpoint, the Lewis a epitope, and links it to the enzymatic steps that produce it. For researchers, this term provides a shared vocabulary for describing glycan biosynthesis and a basis for designing experiments that test whether candidate glycosyltransferases are necessary or sufficient for epitope formation. Because Lewis a is a carbohydrate epitope, its detection depends heavily on antibody specificity and validation, and errors in reagent characterization can lead to incorrect conclusions about pathway activity. Methodological advances in antibody generation, epitope prediction, and repertoire analysis make it possible to interrogate such glycan epitopes with greater confidence. In addition, lessons from epitope mapping in viral and autoantibody systems show how precise epitope definition supports reproducible assays and clinical translation. Finally, studies of carbohydrate modifications and glycan-associated phenotypes in bacterial and cancer models demonstrate the broader biological impact of glycan biosynthetic pathways.
• Provides a precise ontology definition for the biosynthesis of the Lewis a trisaccharide epitope on N-linked oligosaccharides.
• Supports mechanistic studies of glycosyltransferase order and substrate specificity in glycan assembly.
• Enables antibody-based detection of Lewis a in cells and tissues, provided reagents are properly validated.
• Connects glycan pathway biology to computational epitope analysis and antibody specificity prediction.
• Offers a model for distinguishing genuine epitope recognition from cross-reactivity, a recurring problem in immunohistochemistry.
• Links to broader carbohydrate biology, including sialic acid modification and glycan-related phenotypes in infection and cancer.
• Provides a framework for CRISPR knockout and knock-in experiments that test causal roles of glycosyltransferase genes.
• Supports comparative studies of epitope structure and function across viral, autoimmune, and glycan systems.
• Facilitates reproducible assay design by requiring explicit definition of the glycan epitope being measured.
• Helps researchers interpret glycan biomarker data in the context of a defined biosynthetic process.
What Happens During Lewis a epitope biosynthetic process?
Acceptor N-glycan substrate recognition
In simple terms: The pathway starts when an enzyme recognizes a specific sugar chain on a protein and prepares to modify it.
The Lewis a epitope is characteristic of plant protein N-linked oligosaccharides, so the biosynthetic process begins with an N-linked glycan acceptor that presents the appropriate terminal or internal monosaccharide configuration. The process is defined by the chemical reactions and pathways resulting in formation of the Lewis a epitope, a trisaccharide Fuc-alpha-(1->4)[Gal-beta-(1->3)]GlcNAc. Because the epitope is a carbohydrate structure, its formation depends on enzymes that recognize glycan substrates rather than protein sequence motifs. Researchers studying this step need well-validated reagents to detect the glycan product, since antibody-based detection of carbohydrate epitopes is sensitive to reagent specificity.
Galactose addition to form the Gal-beta-(1->3) linkage
In simple terms: A galactose sugar is attached to the growing chain in a specific orientation.
The Lewis a trisaccharide contains a Gal-beta-(1->3) linkage to GlcNAc, so the biosynthetic process includes a galactosyltransferase-type step that installs galactose in beta linkage. This step builds the type 1 chain-like core that is subsequently fucosylated. The QuickGO definition specifies the final trisaccharide structure Fuc-alpha-(1->4)[Gal-beta-(1->3)]GlcNAc, which implies ordered addition of galactose and fucose. Because the exact enzyme inventory can vary by organism and annotation context, researchers should confirm candidate glycosyltransferases experimentally rather than assume a single universal enzyme. Antibody validation guidance is relevant here because detection of the intermediate or final glycan depends on specific reagents.
Fucose addition to form the Fuc-alpha-(1->4) linkage
In simple terms: A fucose sugar is added in alpha linkage to complete the Lewis a trisaccharide.
The defining feature of the Lewis a epitope is the Fuc-alpha-(1->4) linkage to GlcNAc, which distinguishes it from related Lewis structures. The biosynthetic process therefore includes a fucosyltransferase-type step that transfers fucose in alpha configuration. Completion of this step yields the mature trisaccharide Fuc-alpha-(1->4)[Gal-beta-(1->3)]GlcNAc. Because the epitope is small and carbohydrate-based, its detection and quantification require antibodies or lectins with defined specificity, and antibody validation is essential to avoid misassignment of glycan structures. Computational epitope analysis tools can help assess whether a given antibody is likely to recognize the intended glycan or a related structure.
Epitope display on N-linked oligosaccharides
In simple terms: Once built, the Lewis a structure is displayed on the protein's sugar chain where it can be recognized.
After the trisaccharide is assembled, the Lewis a epitope is presented as part of an N-linked oligosaccharide on a protein. This display context matters because antibody access and glycan conformation can influence detection. The QuickGO definition explicitly ties the epitope to plant protein N-linked oligosaccharides, so the process is understood in that structural context. Researchers using immunohistochemistry or related methods should follow consortium recommendations for antibody validation to ensure that observed staining reflects the intended glycan epitope. Lessons from epitope mapping in other systems, such as viral capsid neutralization epitopes and anti-VH autoantibody specificity, illustrate how precise epitope definition improves reproducibility.
Pathway integration and regulation of glycan output
In simple terms: The cell coordinates when and where the Lewis a structure is made.
The biosynthetic process does not operate in isolation; it is integrated with overall N-glycan processing and with the availability of nucleotide-sugar donors. Because the term is defined as a biological process, its regulation can be studied at the level of enzyme expression, substrate supply, and compartmentalization. Experimental dissection of carbohydrate modifications in other systems, such as sialic acid O-acetylation in group B Streptococcus, provides a template for how glycan pathway regulation can be investigated. Likewise, studies of cross-resistance phenotypes in ovarian carcinoma cells show how complex cellular phenotypes can be linked to specific molecular changes. For Lewis a research, CRISPR-based models offer a direct way to test which enzymes are required for epitope formation.
Key Genes Involved in GO:0010493 Lewis a epitope biosynthetic process
The genes and proteins most relevant to GO:0010493 are glycosyltransferases and glycan-processing enzymes, together with the antibody and detection reagents used to study the Lewis a epitope.
| Gene | Major Role | Research Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| FUT-family fucosyltransferases | Transfer fucose to glycan acceptors, potentially forming the Fuc-alpha-(1->4) linkage | Candidate enzymes for the terminal step of Lewis a biosynthesis |
| B3GAL-family galactosyltransferases | Transfer galactose in beta linkage to GlcNAc | Candidate enzymes for forming the Gal-beta-(1->3) core |
| B4GALT-family galactosyltransferases | Transfer galactose in beta linkage to glycan acceptors | Related galactosyltransferases that may act on N-glycan substrates |
| MGAT-family N-acetylglucosaminyltransferases | Initiate and extend N-glycan antennae | Upstream enzymes that create acceptor structures for Lewis a |
| GALNT-family polypeptides | Initiate O-glycosylation and influence glycan diversity | Context for distinguishing N-linked from O-linked glycan epitopes |
| SLC35-family nucleotide-sugar transporters | Transport GDP-fucose and UDP-galactose into the Golgi | Determine donor availability for Lewis a biosynthesis |
| GMDS | Synthesizes GDP-fucose in the de novo pathway | Controls fucose supply for fucosyltransferase reactions |
| FX | Salvage pathway enzyme for GDP-fucose synthesis | Alternative route for fucose donor supply |
| GNE | Bifunctional enzyme in sialic acid biosynthesis | Illustrates nucleotide-sugar pathway logic relevant to glycan donors |
| B3GNT-family enzymes | Extend polylactosamine chains on N-glycans | May generate acceptor structures related to Lewis antigens |
| FUT2 | Alpha(1,2)fucosyltransferase | Model for studying fucosyltransferase specificity and glycan epitopes |
| FUT3 | Alpha(1,3/1,4)fucosyltransferase | Directly relevant to Lewis antigen biosynthesis in human systems |
| FUT4 | Alpha(1,3)fucosyltransferase | Related fucosyltransferase for comparative specificity studies |
| Golgi glycosylation machinery | Provides compartmentalized environment for glycan assembly | Determines localization and order of biosynthetic steps |
| Antibody reagents (anti-Lewis a) | Detect the Lewis a epitope in cells and tissues | Require validation to confirm epitope specificity |
| Ab-Ligity-type computational tools | Identify sequence-dissimilar antibodies binding the same epitope | Support epitope prediction and reagent selection |
| Public antibody repertoire datasets | Provide baseline structural and sequence information | Support analysis of shared epitope recognition |
| Epitope mapping workflows | Define the precise structural target of antibodies | Adaptable to glycan epitope characterization |
How Is Lewis a epitope biosynthetic process Regulated?
Regulation of GO:0010493 can be considered at several levels. First, expression of the glycosyltransferases that build the Lewis a trisaccharide determines whether the pathway is active. Second, availability of nucleotide-sugar donors such as GDP-fucose and UDP-galactose, which depends on biosynthetic and transport enzymes, constrains the rate of glycan assembly. Third, the Golgi environment and the order of glycan-processing steps influence which acceptor structures are available. Because the term is defined as a biological process, regulatory studies typically combine genetic perturbation with glycan detection. Antibody validation is a prerequisite for such studies, since detection of the Lewis a epitope depends on reagent specificity. Computational and repertoire-based approaches can further inform which antibodies are likely to report the intended epitope. Comparative studies of carbohydrate modifications and glycan-associated phenotypes provide additional context for how glycan pathways are regulated in different biological settings.
Lewis a epitope biosynthetic process and Human Disease
| Gene | Disease / Biology | Potential Experimental Model |
|---|---|---|
| FUT3 | Lewis antigen expression and glycan biomarker biology | Knockout and overexpression cell models with glycan detection |
| FUT2 | Fucosyltransferase specificity and glycan epitope formation | Point-mutation models to test catalytic residues |
| B3GAL-family galactosyltransferases | Glycan core formation relevant to Lewis-type structures | Knockout cells followed by lectin or antibody staining |
| SLC35-family transporters | Nucleotide-sugar supply and glycan pathway flux | Knockout and rescue models with donor supplementation |
| Anti-Lewis a antibody reagents | Epitope detection in cancer and tissue studies | Validated immunohistochemistry with specificity controls |
Lewis a epitope biology in cancer and glycan biomarker research
Lewis-type carbohydrate antigens are widely studied as glycan markers, and the biosynthetic process defined by GO:0010493 provides a framework for interpreting such markers. Cancer cell models with altered glycan phenotypes, such as ovarian carcinoma cells selected for cross-resistance, illustrate how glycan-related changes can accompany drug-resistance phenotypes. Although the cited study focuses on cross-resistance mechanisms rather than Lewis a specifically, it demonstrates the general principle that glycan and membrane changes can be functionally linked to disease-relevant phenotypes. Researchers studying Lewis a in cancer should use validated antibodies and, where possible, genetic models to test causality.
Infection and carbohydrate modification
Carbohydrate modifications on microbial surfaces can influence host-pathogen interactions. The discovery and characterization of sialic acid O-acetylation in group B Streptococcus shows how a specific glycan modification can be dissected at the molecular level. This work provides a methodological template for studying glycan biosynthetic pathways, including Lewis-type structures, in microbial and host contexts. For GO:0010493, the key lesson is that precise structural definition and validated detection reagents are essential for linking a glycan modification to a biological function.
Epitope specificity and autoimmune or therapeutic antibody contexts
Understanding how antibodies recognize small epitopes is directly relevant to glycan research. Studies of human anti-VH autoantibodies and their impact on the design and clinical testing of a VH domain antibody antagonist of TNF receptor 1 show how epitope specificity affects reagent behavior and therapeutic development. Similarly, identification of a neutralization epitope in the SV40 VP1 capsid protein demonstrates how epitope mapping can define functionally important sites. These examples support the broader principle that epitope definition, whether protein or carbohydrate, is central to reproducible research and translation.
Antibody validation as a prerequisite for disease-relevant glycan studies
Because Lewis a is a carbohydrate epitope, disease studies that rely on anti-Lewis a antibodies must address specificity and reproducibility. Consortium recommendations for antibody validation in immunohistochemistry provide concrete guidance for biomarker discovery and tissue-based studies. Genetic methods of antibody generation offer additional routes to well-defined reagents. Computational tools such as Ab-Ligity and analyses of public antibody repertoires can help identify antibodies that bind the same epitope despite sequence dissimilarity, supporting more informed reagent selection.
From Lewis a epitope biosynthetic process-Related Genes to Experimental Models
| Research Question | Suitable Model |
|---|---|
| Is a candidate fucosyltransferase required for Lewis a epitope formation? | CRISPR knockout cell line with anti-Lewis a detection |
| Does a specific catalytic residue control fucose transfer? | Point-mutation knock-in of the candidate enzyme |
| Can a tagged enzyme be tracked through the secretory pathway? | Tagged knock-in of the glycosyltransferase |
| Does overexpression of a glycosyltransferase increase Lewis a epitope levels? | Overexpression cell model with quantitative glycan readout |
| Which genes are essential for glycan pathway activity? | CRISPR library screening with glycan-based selection |
| How does donor supply affect epitope formation? | Knockout or overexpression of nucleotide-sugar pathway genes |
How to Study the Lewis a epitope biosynthetic process Process
| Method | What It Measures | Typical Application |
|---|---|---|
| Immunohistochemistry | Presence and distribution of Lewis a epitope | Tissue-based glycan detection with validated antibodies |
| Antibody specificity assays | Binding to intended versus related glycan structures | Reagent validation for Lewis a studies |
| Ab-Ligity computational analysis | Sequence-dissimilar antibodies binding the same epitope | Reagent selection and epitope prediction |
| Public repertoire analysis | Shared structural features of antibody recognition | Context for antibody functional commonality |
| Epitope mapping | Precise structural target of an antibody | Adaptable to glycan and protein epitopes |
| CRISPR knockout | Requirement of a gene for epitope formation | Causal testing of glycosyltransferase candidates |
| CRISPR knock-in / point mutation | Effect of specific residues or tags on pathway activity | Mechanistic dissection of enzyme function |
| Overexpression | Sufficiency of a gene to increase epitope levels | Gain-of-function glycan pathway studies |
Antibody-based detection and validation
Detection of the Lewis a epitope relies on antibodies or lectins with defined specificity. Because carbohydrate epitopes can be cross-reactive, antibody validation is essential. Genetic methods of antibody generation and consortium recommendations for immunohistochemistry validation provide the methodological basis for confirming that a reagent detects the intended epitope. Researchers should include negative controls, competing glycan structures, and, where possible, genetic models lacking the epitope.
Computational epitope and antibody analysis
Computational tools can support reagent selection and epitope interpretation. Ab-Ligity identifies sequence-dissimilar antibodies that bind to the same epitope, which is useful when selecting anti-glycan antibodies. Analyses of public baseline and shared response structures provide context for antibody repertoire functional commonality. These approaches complement experimental validation and can help prioritize antibodies for Lewis a studies.
Glycan analysis by mass spectrometry and chromatography
Structural confirmation of the Lewis a trisaccharide requires analytical methods that can resolve glycan composition and linkage. Although the verified citations provided here focus on antibody and epitope methods, the general principle is that glycan structures should be confirmed by methods independent of antibody detection. This reduces the risk of misassignment due to cross-reactive reagents.
Genetic perturbation and pathway dissection
CRISPR knockout, point mutation, knock-in, and overexpression models allow causal testing of candidate genes in the Lewis a biosynthetic process. Comparative studies of carbohydrate modifications and glycan-associated phenotypes, such as sialic acid O-acetylation in group B Streptococcus and cross-resistance in ovarian carcinoma cells, illustrate how genetic and biochemical perturbation can be combined to dissect glycan pathways.
How CRISPR Can Be Used to Study GO:0010493 Lewis a epitope biosynthetic process
Knockout
CRISPR knockout of candidate glycosyltransferase genes is used to test whether they are required for Lewis a epitope formation. Loss of the epitope can be monitored with validated antibodies or lectins, and rescue experiments can confirm specificity. Because antibody-based detection of carbohydrate epitopes requires careful validation, knockout models should be paired with reagent controls.
Point Mutation
Point-mutation models allow researchers to test the role of specific catalytic or substrate-binding residues in enzymes proposed to act in the Lewis a biosynthetic process. By introducing defined mutations, it is possible to separate catalytic activity from protein stability or localization. Such experiments benefit from precise epitope detection and, where relevant, computational prediction of antibody or enzyme specificity.
Knock-in
Knock-in models can be used to add tags or reporter sequences to glycosyltransferases, enabling tracking of enzyme localization and expression. Tagged knock-in lines are particularly useful for studying Golgi-resident enzymes involved in glycan assembly. The resulting models can be combined with antibody-based detection of the Lewis a epitope to link enzyme behavior to pathway output.
Overexpression
Overexpression models test whether increased levels of a candidate enzyme are sufficient to elevate Lewis a epitope levels. Such gain-of-function experiments complement knockout studies and can reveal rate-limiting steps in the pathway. Interpretation requires validated detection reagents and, ideally, independent structural confirmation of the glycan product.
How EDITGENE Supports Lewis a epitope biosynthetic process Research
Researchers studying Lewis a epitope biosynthetic process-related genes often need to determine whether a candidate gene is causally involved in epitope formation, rather than merely correlated with it. This requires well-controlled genetic models, validated detection reagents, and, in many cases, computational support for epitope and antibody analysis. EDITGENE provides integrated CRISPR cell model and screening services designed to support exactly this kind of causal, publication-ready research.
Contact EDITGENE today to design your custom CRISPR model for Lewis a epitope biosynthetic process research.
Frequently Asked Questions About Lewis a epitope biosynthetic process
What is GO:0010493?
GO:0010493 is the Gene Ontology biological process term for Lewis a epitope biosynthetic process, defined as the chemical reactions and pathways resulting in formation of the Lewis a epitope, a trisaccharide Fuc-alpha-(1->4)[Gal-beta-(1->3)]GlcNAc characteristic of plant protein N-linked oligosaccharides.
What is the Lewis a epitope?
The Lewis a epitope is a trisaccharide with the structure Fuc-alpha-(1->4)[Gal-beta-(1->3)]GlcNAc, and it is characteristic of plant protein N-linked oligosaccharides according to the QuickGO definition.
What genes are involved in Lewis a epitope biosynthetic process?
The process involves glycosyltransferases that add galactose and fucose to glycan acceptors, together with nucleotide-sugar pathway enzymes and transporters. Candidate genes include fucosyltransferases, galactosyltransferases, and Golgi nucleotide-sugar transporters, though the exact enzyme inventory should be confirmed experimentally.
What is the synonym for GO:0010493?
The synonym is LE A biosynthetic process.
Which ontology aspect does GO:0010493 belong to?
GO:0010493 belongs to the biological_process aspect of the Gene Ontology.
How do researchers detect the Lewis a epitope?
Researchers typically detect the Lewis a epitope using antibodies or lectins, and antibody validation is essential because carbohydrate epitopes can be cross-reactive.
Why is antibody validation important for Lewis a research?
Antibody validation is important because immunohistochemistry and related methods can produce misleading results if reagents are not specific. Consortium recommendations provide guidance for validating antibodies used in biomarker and tissue studies.
Can CRISPR be used to study Lewis a epitope biosynthesis?
Yes. CRISPR knockout, point mutation, knock-in, and overexpression models can test whether candidate genes are required or sufficient for Lewis a epitope formation, provided that glycan detection is performed with validated reagents.
What computational tools help with epitope analysis?
Tools such as Ab-Ligity can identify sequence-dissimilar antibodies that bind the same epitope, and analyses of public antibody repertoires provide context for shared epitope recognition.
What experimental models are suitable for studying GO:0010493?
Suitable models include CRISPR knockout cell lines, point-mutation knock-ins, tagged knock-ins, overexpression lines, and pooled CRISPR screens, combined with validated glycan detection methods.
Conclusion
GO:0010493, Lewis a epitope biosynthetic process, defines the pathway that builds the Lewis a trisaccharide Fuc-alpha-(1->4)[Gal-beta-(1->3)]GlcNAc on plant protein N-linked oligosaccharides. Its study requires a combination of glycan enzymology, validated antibody-based detection, and, increasingly, computational epitope analysis. The verified literature cited here supports the importance of antibody validation, epitope definition, and rigorous reagent characterization in glycan research. For researchers seeking causal evidence, CRISPR-based cell models offer a direct route to test which genes are required or sufficient for Lewis a epitope formation. EDITGENE provides knockout, point-mutation, knock-in, overexpression, library screening, and bioinformatics services to support such studies from hypothesis to publication-ready data.
References
- 1. Schofield DJ et al.. 2014. Genetic methods of antibody generation and their use in immunohistochemistry.. Methods 70(1):20-7 PMID: 24607317
- 2. Murata H et al.. 2008. Identification of a neutralization epitope in the VP1 capsid protein of SV40.. Virology 381(1):116-22 PMID: 18789470
- 3. Wong WK et al.. 2021. Ab-Ligity: identifying sequence-dissimilar antibodies that bind to the same epitope.. MAbs 13(1):1873478 PMID: 33448242
- 4. Raybould MIJ et al.. 2021. Public Baseline and shared response structures support the theory of antibody repertoire functional commonality.. PLoS Comput Biol 17(3):e1008781 PMID: 33647011
- 5. Howat WJ et al.. 2014. Antibody validation of immunohistochemistry for biomarker discovery: recommendations of a consortium of academic and pharmaceutical based histopathology researchers.. Methods 70(1):34-8 PMID: 24525140
- 6. Cordy JC et al.. 2015. Specificity of human anti-variable heavy (VH ) chain autoantibodies and impact on the design and clinical testing of a VH domain antibody antagonist of tumour necrosis factor-α receptor 1.. Clin Exp Immunol 182(2):139-48 PMID: 26178412
- 7. Lewis AL et al.. 2004. Discovery and characterization of sialic acid O-acetylation in group B Streptococcus.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(30):11123-8 PMID: 15263085
- 8. Lau DH et al.. 1991. Multifactorial mechanisms associated with broad cross-resistance of ovarian carcinoma cells selected by cyanomorpholino doxorubicin.. Cancer Res 51(19):5181-7 PMID: 1717140