PFKL Knockout HCT 116 Cell Line
Cat.No.:
EDJ-KQ21139
Species:
Human
Cell Name:
HCT 116
Gene:
PFKL
Gene ID:
5211
Size:
1×10⁶cells
PFKL Knockout Cell Line (HCT116) is an exclusive upgraded CRISPR/Cas9 system-mediated gene knockout cell, with the advantages of Optimized Strategy Design, Efficient Cell Transfection, High-Performance Cas9 Protein and Hassle-Free Cell Selection.
| Cat.No. | EDJ-KQ21139 |
|---|---|
| Product Name | PFKL Knockout HCT 116 Cell Line |
| Cell Line | HCT 116 |
| Cellosaurus ID | CVCL_0291 |
| Cell Line Synonyms | HCT-116, HCT.116, HCT_116, HCT116, HCT116wt, HCT-116/P, HCT-116/parental, CoCL2 |
| Gene | PFKL |
| NCBI Gene ID | |
| Gene Synonyms | ATP-PFK|PFK-B|PFK-L |
| Summary |
This gene encodes the liver (L) subunit of an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of D-fructose 6-phosphate to D-fructose 1,6-bisphosphate, which is a key step in glucose metabolism (glycolysis). This enzyme is a tetramer that may be composed of different subunits encoded by distinct genes in different tissues. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2014]
|
| Associated Diseases | Colorectal Carcinoma |
| Morphology | Adherent |
| Passage Ratio | 1/5-1/4,2days |
| Complete Culture Medium | mcCoy5A+10%FBS |
| Freezing Medium | 90%FBS/Complete culture medium+10% DMSO |
| QC | Indels validated by Sanger sequencing; sterility confirmed via microbial testing. |
* For research use only. Not intended for use in humans or animals, including clinical, therapeutic, or diagnostic purposes.
| Loci | STR Info (Sample Cell) Sample Cell Line: HCT 116 | STR Info (Cell bank) Cell Line: HCT 116 | ||||||
| Allele1 | Allele2 | Allele3 | Allele4 | Allele1 | Allele2 | Allele3 | Allele4 | |
| Amelogenin | X | X | ||||||
| CSF1PO | 7 | 10 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 11 | ||
| D2S1338 | 16 | 16 | ||||||
| D3S1358 | 12 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 12 | 18 | 19 | |
| D5S818 | 10 | 11 | 10 | 11 | ||||
| D7S820 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 12 | ||||
| D8S1179 | 10 | 12 | 14 | 15 | 10 | 12 | 14 | 15 |
| D13S317 | 10 | 12 | 10 | 12 | ||||
| D16S539 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | ||
| D18S51 | 16 | 17 | 16 | 17 | ||||
| D19S433 | 12 | 13 | 12 | |||||
| D21S11 | 29 | 30 | 29 | 30 | ||||
| FGA | 18 | 23 | 18 | 23 | ||||
| Penta D | 9 | 13 | 9 | 13 | ||||
| Penta E | 12 | 13 | 14 | 12 | 13 | 14 | ||
| TH01 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | ||||
| TPOX | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| vWA | 17 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 17 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| D6S1043 | 13 | |||||||
| D12S391 | 17 | 21 | 22 | |||||
| D2S441 | 11 | 12 | ||||||
* STR authentication data of this cell line matches with that of cell lines sourced from ATCC, DSMZ, JCRB, and RIKEN databases.
Conclusion: The STR identification of this cell is correct.
Conclusion: The STR identification of this cell is correct.
* Research Use Disclaimer: Content is generated from publicly available research data, bioinformatic resources, and computational analyses for research reference only.
Related Publications
P53 - a new player in the metabolic adaptation of colorectal carcinoma cells under hypoxia.
IF=3.4
BMC cancer
BACKGROUND:Colorectal cancer (CRC) frequently exhibits hypoxic regions due to poor vascularization, leading to the stabilization of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1α). Moreover, mutations in the tumour suppressor p53 occur in approximately half of all CRCs. While the individual roles of both transcription factors in tumour cell survival are well characterized, their interaction and its influence on the metabolic adaptation of CRC cells under hypoxic stress remain unclear. METHODS:Using HCT116 CRC cells with targeted deletions of TP53 and HIF1A, we examined the effects of p53 loss on HIF-1 signalling and the respective consequences for metabolic adaptation as well as the survival of CRC cells under moderate (1% O₂) and severe (0.1% O₂) hypoxia. RESULTS:Severe hypoxia stabilized p53 protein levels despite the transcriptional repression of TP53, possibly through posttranslational mechanisms and dependent on nutrient availability. In contrast to the assumption that p53 is transcriptionally inactive under hypoxia, we observed stable expression of p53 target genes (P21, BAX) under severe hypoxia, indicating functional transactivation. Loss of p53 impaired the early induction of HIF-1 target genes (VEGF, PHD2), although HIF-1α protein levels and DNA binding were unaffected, suggesting a coactivator role for p53. Furthermore, compared with wild-type cells, p53-deficient cells presented delayed but exaggerated expression of glycolytic genes, including Glucose Uptake Transporter 1 (GLUT1), Phosphofructokinase Liver-Type (PFKL) and Lactate Dehydrogenase A (LDHA), under hypoxia, with no impairment of glycolytic function or cell viability. Remarkably, even HIF1A knockout cells preserved glycolysis, whereas glycolytic genes were significantly downregulated, indicating HIF-1-independent metabolic compensation. CONCLUSION:Our findings position p53 as a temporal gatekeeper and key regulator of hypoxic adaptation in CRC cells, coordinating early gene induction and metabolic responses. The ability of CRC cells to maintain glycolysis despite the loss of p53, respectively, HIF-1α underscores the existence of compensatory HIF-independent pathways. Targeting these alternative circuits may represent a promising strategy in hypoxic, p53-deficient CRC.